Cases 81 - 90 of 97
Laney v. Medtronic, Inc. et al
as 1:2008cv02597
Plaintiff:
Tammy Laney and Tammy Laney
Defendant:
Medtronic, Inc., Medtronic International Technology, Inc. and Medtronic Puerto Rico Operations Co.
Cause Of Action: Diversity
Coyle v. Medtronic Inc et al
as 3:2008cv00373
Plaintiff:
Lloyd Ray Coyle and Lloyd Ray Coyle
Defendant:
Medtronic Inc, Medtronic Puerto Rico Operations Co. and Medtronic International Technology Inc
Cause Of Action: Diversity
Beach et al v. Medtronic, Inc. et al
as 2:2008cv00788
Plaintiff:
Marvin J. Beach and Nancy Beach
Defendant:
Medtronic, Inc.
Cause Of Action: Diversity
McCarty v. Medtronic, Inc. et al
as 1:2008cv00322
Plaintiff:
Irene McCarty and Irene McCarty
Defendant:
Medtronic, Inc., Medtronic Puerto Rico, Inc. and Medtronic Puerto Rico Operations Co.
Cause Of Action: Diversity
Steck et al v. Biomedical Tissue Services, Ltd. et al
as 2:2008cv00056
Plaintiff:
Karen Steck and Edward Steck
Defendant:
Biomedical Tissue Services, Ltd., Regeneration Technologies, Inc., Spinalgraft Technologies, LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Medical Malpractice
Allen v. Medtronic, Inc. et al
as 1:2008cv00071
Plaintiff:
Thomas E. Allen and Thomas E. Allen
Defendant:
Medtronic, Inc., Medtronic Puerto Rico, Inc. and Medtronic Puerto Rico Operations Co.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Bayless v. Medtronic, Inc. et al
as 2:2007cv01120
Plaintiff:
Robert Bayless
Defendant:
Medtronic, Inc. and John Does 1-3
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
Schuholz v. Medtronic, Inc. et al
as 1:2007cv00600
Plaintiff:
Albert Schuholz
Defendant:
Medtronic, Inc., St. John's Hospital and U. S. Medical Center for Federal Prisoners
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Inman v. Medtronic, Inc.
as 1:2007cv00396
Plaintiff:
Elizabeth T. Inman and Elizabeth T. Inman
Defendant:
Medtronic, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
