Cases 81 - 86 of 86
Dunigan v. Purdue Pharma, L. P. et al
as 2:2009cv11809
Defendant:
Purdue Pharma, L. P. and Purdue Frederick Company, Inc.
Plaintiff:
Denise Dunigan
Cause Of Action: No cause code entered
Procter and Gamble Company et al vs Sun Pharma Global, Incorporated
as 2:2009cv10342
Plaintiff:
Procter and Gamble Company and Hoffmann-La Roche Incorporated
Defendant:
Sun Pharma Global, Incorporated
Cause Of Action: 35 U.S.C. § 271 Patent Infringement
Sanofi-Aventis et al v. Torrent Pharma Inc. et al
as 1:2007cv00969
Plaintiff:
Sanofi-Aventis and Sanofi-Aventis U.S. LLC
Defendant:
Torrent Pharma Inc. and Torrent Pharmaceuticals Limited
Cause Of Action: 35 U.S.C. § 145 Patent Infringement
Grant et al v. DSM Pharma Chemicals North America, Inc.
as 1:2007cv00312
Plaintiff:
Jeff Grant, Michael Brown, Kathy Buist and others
Defendant:
DSM Pharma Chemicals North America, Inc. and DSM Pharma Chemicals North America, Inc.
Counter-claimant:
DSM Pharma Chemicals North America, Inc. and DSM Pharma Chemicals North America, Inc.
Counter-defendant:
Philip Kenreich, George D. Hooper, David B. Bennett and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- ERISA
Warner v. DSM Pharma Chemicals North America, Inc.
as 1:2007cv00302
Plaintiff:
Robert H. Warner, II
Defendant:
DSM Pharma Chemicals North America, Inc. and DSM Pharma Chemicals North America, Inc.
Counter-claimant:
DSM Pharma Chemicals North America, Inc. and DSM Pharma Chemicals North America, Inc.
Counter-defendant:
Robert H. Warner, II
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- ERISA
DSM Pharma Chemicals North America, Inc. v. Webb Chemical Service Corp.
as 1:2007cv00040
Plaintiff:
DSM Pharma Chemicals North America, Inc. and DSM Pharma Chemicals North America, Inc.
Defendant:
Webb Chemical Service Corp. and Webb Chemical Service Corp.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Other Contract
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
