Cases 81 - 90 of 114
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2013cv00310
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 451 Employment Discrimination
Ramirez v. Federal Home Loan Mortgage Corporation
as 2:2013cv00706
Defendant:
Federal Home Loan Mortgage Corporation
Plaintiff:
Jorge Ramirez
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1444 Petition for Removal- Foreclosure
Ramirez v. Bisbee et al
as 3:2013cv00133
Defendant:
Connie Bisbee, Tony Corda, Adam Endel and others
Plaintiff:
Steve Ramirez
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Ramirez v. Colvin
as 2:2013cv00440
Defendant:
Carolyn W. Colvin
Plaintiff:
Manuel R. Ramirez
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 205 Denial Social Security Benefits
Ramirez v. Supervalu, Inc. et al
as 2:2013cv00204
Defendant:
New Albertson's, Inc. and Supervalu, Inc.
Plaintiff:
Heather Ramirez
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Personal Injury
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2013cv00031
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Employment Discrimination
Ramirez v. Baker et al
as 3:2013cv00025
Respondent:
Baker and Nevada Attorney General
Petitioner:
Armando Ramirez
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
J&J Sports Productions, Inc. v. Ramirez
as 2:2012cv01553
Plaintiff:
J&J Sports Productions, Inc.
Defendant:
Alejandro Ramirez
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Ramirez v. Las Vegas Metropolitan Police Department et al
as 2:2012cv01434
Defendant:
Gregory Lee Hoover, Las Vegas Metropolitan Police Department and Naphcare, Inc.
Plaintiff:
Marcos Ramirez
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2012cv01343
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1601 Truth in Lending
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
