Cases 81 - 90 of 100
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2026cv02982
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 08 U.S.C. § 1329 Writ of Mandamus to Adjudicate Visa Petiti
Montelongo (PS) v. Johnson et al
as 1:2026cv02959
Plaintiff:
Gabriel Montelongo
Defendant:
Amie Jane Johnson, Milo Quintana, Gina Maria Simonson and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2026cv02938
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 a Title II Civil Rights Act 1964
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2026cv02941
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681 Fair Credit Reporting Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2026cv02918
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681 Fair Credit Reporting Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2026cv02872
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
Krestancic v. TopBuild Corporation et al
as 1:2026cv02875
Plaintiff:
Jeffrey M Krestancic
Defendant:
TopBuild Corporation and TopBuild Support Services, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Labor
Thomas v. Douglas County Department of Human Services et al
as 1:2026cv02861
Plaintiff:
Alexandra Thomas
Defendant:
Douglas County Department of Human Services, Samantha Buck, Anthony Parrish and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2026cv02837
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361 - Petition for Writ of Mandamus
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2026cv02839
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361 - Petition for Writ of Mandamus
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
