Cases 81 - 90 of 594
SEEGERT v. BOSTON SCIENTIFIC CORPORATION
as 2:2015cv01704
Plaintiff:
NORMA SEEGERT
Defendant:
BOSTON SCIENTIFIC CORPORATION
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
NATIONS v. BOSTON SCIENTIFIC CORPORATION
as 2:2015cv01699
Plaintiff:
SHELLY MARIE NATIONS
Defendant:
BOSTON SCIENTIFIC CORPORATION
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
POSTON v. BOSTON SCIENTIFIC CORPORATION
as 2:2015cv01710
Plaintiff:
LINDA D. POSTON
Defendant:
BOSTON SCIENTIFIC CORPORATION
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
SIZEMORE et al v. SCIENTIFIC DRILLING INTERNATIONAL, INC.
as 2:2015cv00426
Plaintiff:
BRUCE SIZEMORE , TYLER BEYER and JOHN MONICA
Defendant:
SCIENTIFIC DRILLING INTERNATIONAL, INC.
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201 Fair Labor Standards Act
MOTEN v. BOSTON SCIENTIFIC CORPORATION et al
as 2:2015cv01555
Plaintiff:
RHONDA MOTEN
Defendant:
BOSTON SCIENTIFIC CORPORATION and C.R. BARD, INC.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
VAGT v. BOSTON SCIENTIFIC CORPORATION et al
as 2:2015cv01557
Plaintiff:
CHERYL A. VAGT
Defendant:
BOSTON SCIENTIFIC CORPORATION , C.R. BARD, INC. and SOFRADIM PRODUCTION SAS
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
WILLSEY v. BOSTON SCIENTIFIC CORPORATION et al
as 2:2015cv01549
Plaintiff:
BETTY ANN WILLSEY
Defendant:
BOSTON SCIENTIFIC CORPORATION , ETHICON, INC. and JOHNSON & JOHNSON
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
DIAZ v. BOSTON SCIENTIFIC CORPORATION et al
as 2:2015cv01559
Plaintiff:
SANDRA DIAZ
Defendant:
BOSTON SCIENTIFIC CORPORATION , C.R. BARD, INC. and SOFRADIM PRODUCTION, SAS
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
WRIGHT v. BOSTON SCIENTIFIC CORPORATION et al
as 2:2015cv01556
Plaintiff:
PATRICIA RUTH WRIGHT
Defendant:
BOSTON SCIENTIFIC CORPORATION and C.R. BARD, INC.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
JIRAK v. BOSTON SCIENTIFIC CORPORATION
as 2:2015cv01551
Plaintiff:
MARIE A. JIRAK
Defendant:
BOSTON SCIENTIFIC CORPORATION
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
