Cases 81 - 90 of 20,178
Browne v. Zebro et al
as 1:2024cv02781
Plaintiff:
Kendall Browne
Defendant:
P.O. James J. Zebro, P.O. Mark P. Shackel, P.O. Anthony P. Guidice and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights
French v. Montgomery et al
as 9:2024cv00523
Plaintiff:
Darren French and Daren French
Defendant:
J. Montgomery, Sgt. Extrand, John Doe #1 and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Hagan v. U.S. Marshal
as 1:2024cv02897
Plaintiff:
Christopher Hagan
Defendant:
U.S. Marshal
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Burns v. Smith
as 1:2024cv01860
Plaintiff:
George Burns
Defendant:
Patrick A. Smith
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Rifenburg v. Heimer et al
as 9:2024cv00524
Plaintiff:
Alex Rifenburg
Defendant:
Antonia Heimer and Madison County Jail
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Vreeland v. Onondaga County Justice Center et al
as 9:2024cv00521
Plaintiff:
Elijah Q. Vreeland
Defendant:
Onondaga County Justice Center, Dep Rapp, Doe 1 and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Pittman v. State of Georgia
as 1:2024cv02892
Plaintiff:
Nadira A. Pittman
Defendant:
State of Georgia
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Hickman v. A.C.C./A.S.P.C.A. et al
as 1:2024cv02825
Plaintiff:
Quandell Hickman
Defendant:
A.C.C./A.S.P.C.A., Jaylen and Supervisors
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Lucas v. Kelley et al
as 9:2024cv00502
Plaintiff:
London Lucas and London H. Lucas
Defendant:
Kelley, Dr. Macri, RN Napoli and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Mercer v. New York City Police Dept. - 47 Precinct et al
as 1:2024cv02803
Plaintiff:
Ira Mercer
Defendant:
New York City Police Dept. - 47 Precinct, Detective Christopher Sally, Darcel Clark and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
