Cases 81 - 90 of 6,758
Crimmins v. United States et al
as 7:2024cv00995
Plaintiff:
Thomas W. Crimmins
Defendant:
United States, J.A. Jamison, Carnales and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Almonte v. Doe et al
as 7:2024cv00818
Plaintiff:
Joel Almonte
Defendant:
P.O. "John" Doe, John Doe#s, Area S.G.T and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Footman v. Doherty et al
as 2:2024cv02190
Plaintiff:
Karon Footman
Defendant:
Dale Doherty, Jeffrey Foster, Errol D Toulon and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Larmon v. Queens Berry Correctional et al
as 1:2024cv02191
Plaintiff:
Daniel Larmon
Defendant:
Queens Berry Correctional, C.O. #8413 White, Tomas and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Antrobus v. New York City et al
as 1:2024cv02197
Plaintiff:
Andre Antrobus
Defendant:
New York City and New York Police Department
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Larmon v. Queens Berry Correctional et al
as 1:2024cv01976
Plaintiff:
Daniel Larmon
Defendant:
Queens Berry Correctional, Officer White, Sergeant Tomas and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Benitez v. Neal et al
as 1:2024cv02149
Plaintiff:
Alejandro Benitez
Defendant:
Messiah Neal and Orange County Jail
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Phillips v. Polanco et al
as 1:2024cv02152
Plaintiff:
Marquis Phillips
Defendant:
Edwin Polanco and John Doe ADS L.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Clark v. Hutchison et al
as 1:2024cv02147
Plaintiff:
Cleon Anthony Clark
Defendant:
Officer Hutchison and Officer Martinez
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Williams v. Bureau of Prisons
as 1:2024cv00867
Petitioner:
Daryl Williams
Respondent:
Bureau of Prisons, Warden Jessica Sage and BoP
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 fd Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
