Cases 81 - 90 of 11,770
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2024cv00475
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681 Fair Credit Reporting Act
Duncan v. Capital One, N.A.
as 3:2024cv00474
Plaintiff:
Deborah Duncan
Defendant:
Capital One, N.A.
Cause Of Action: 47 U.S.C. § 227 Restrictions of Use of Telephone Equipment
Fernandez v. Unicorn Wealth LLC et al
as 3:2024cv00469
Plaintiff:
Antonio Fernandez
Defendant:
Unicorn Wealth LLC and Does 1-50
Cause Of Action: 47 U.S.C. § 227 Restrictions of Use of Telephone Equipment
Duncan v. Affirm Loan Services, LLC
as 3:2024cv00470
Plaintiff:
Deborah Duncan
Defendant:
Affirm Loan Services, LLC
Cause Of Action: 47 U.S.C. § 227 Restrictions of Use of Telephone Equipment
Duncan v. Credit One Bank, National Association
as 3:2024cv00471
Plaintiff:
Deborah Duncan
Defendant:
Credit One Bank, National Association
Cause Of Action: 47 U.S.C. § 227 Restrictions of Use of Telephone Equipment
Allen v. Capital One, N.A.
as 3:2024cv00472
Plaintiff:
Pilar Allen
Defendant:
Capital One, N.A.
Cause Of Action: 47 U.S.C. § 227 Restrictions of Use of Telephone Equipment
Tighties, Inc. v. Thor et al
as 3:2024cv00465
Plaintiff:
Tighties, Inc.
Defendant:
Arni Thor, Shireen Thor and Does 1 through 20
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2024cv00139
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
Duncan v. Lending Club Bank, National Association
as 3:2024cv00463
Plaintiff:
Deborah Duncan
Defendant:
Lending Club Bank, National Association
Cause Of Action: 47 U.S.C. § 227 Restrictions of Use of Telephone Equipment
Estate of Ashli Babbitt et al v. U.S. Department of Justice
as 3:2024cv00119
Plaintiff:
Estate of Ashli Babbitt and Aaron Babbitt
Defendant:
U.S. Department of Justice
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 0552 fi Freedom of Information Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
