Prisoner Petitions Cases filed in the US District Court for the Northern District of Florida
Cases 81 - 90 of 14,073
HASTINGS v. MCNEIL
as 4:2024cv00067
Plaintiff: WEAVER SOL HASTINGS
Defendant: WALT MCNEIL
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
COOPER v. HOLLAND et al
as 5:2024cv00032
Plaintiff: LEMUEL L COOPER
Defendant: HEATH HOLLAND and M BREWER
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
RINKINS v. SECRETARY DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS
as 4:2024cv00056
Petitioner: MICHAEL J RINKINS
Respondent: SECRETARY DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
GALINDO v. GORMAN
as 4:2024cv00058
Plaintiff: LAZARO HELIBERTO GALINDO
Defendant: OFFICER GORMAN and GORMAN
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
KENDRICK v. WHISTLER et al
as 1:2024cv00055
Defendant: RICHARD OLETO CHANG, DARLA KAY WHISTLER, JUSTIN AUSTIN TORRES and others
Plaintiff: ANTONIO LAMONT KENDRICK
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
MCGHEE v. LYKINS
as 3:2024cv00134
Petitioner: DARRYL D MCGHEE
Respondent: LINDA LYKINS
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
MARTINEZ v. LESLIE et al
as 3:2024cv00133
Plaintiff: DIEGO C. MARTINEZ
Defendant: ZAKARY LESLIE and FLORIDA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
COBURN v. STATE OF FLORIDA
as 5:2024cv00035
Petitioner: PALMER EDWARD COBURN
Respondent: STATE OF FLORIDA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
COOPER v. KIRKLAND
as 5:2024cv00038
Plaintiff: LEMUEL L COOPER
Defendant: KIRKLAND
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
WILDER v. STATE OF FLORIDA
as 4:2024cv00147
Plaintiff: ANTONIOUS WILDER and LARRY A DAWKINS
Defendant: STATE OF FLORIDA
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?