Cases 81 - 90 of 40,302
Rodriguez-Garcia v. Woods et al
as 5:2024cv00198
Plaintiff:
Misbel Rodriguez-Garcia
Defendant:
Billie Woods, FNU Santos and Jane Doe
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Owens, Jr. v. Crews et al
as 3:2024cv00210
Plaintiff:
Albert T. Owens, Jr.
Defendant:
C. Lane, C. Crews, A. Figueroa and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
McNeil v. Lochrie et al
as 5:2024cv00092
Plaintiff:
Joel McNeil
Defendant:
FNU Lochrie, FNU Strickland, FNU Isha and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Bailey v. Warden, FCC Coleman USP 1
as 5:2024cv00197
Petitioner:
Deon Anthony Romell Bailey
Respondent:
Warden, FCC Coleman USP 1
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Brown v. Warden, FCC Coleman-USP 1
as 5:2024cv00196
Petitioner:
Brandon Evertt Brown
Respondent:
Shannon Withers and Federal Bureau of Prisons - Central Office
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Wooden v. Department of Justice
as 5:2024cv00200
Plaintiff:
Jessie Wooden
Defendant:
Department of Justice
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Bivens Act
Wright v. Secretary, Department of Corrections
as 3:2024cv00391
Plaintiff:
Darian M. Wright
Defendant:
Secretary, Department of Corrections
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Gill v. Broton et al
as 5:2024cv00090
Plaintiff:
Raymond Edward Gill
Defendant:
Warden Jennifer A. Broton, Assistant Warden Avery, B. Pavigliqnti and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Bivens Act
Clark v. Withers et al
as 5:2024cv00192
Plaintiff:
George Clark
Defendant:
Shannon Withers and FNU George
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Bivens Act
Ross v. Finkle et al
as 8:2024cv00915
Plaintiff:
Arthur Lee Ross
Defendant:
Brandon L. Finkle
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
