Cases 81 - 90 of 6,714
CASTILLO-VAZQUEZ v. WARDEN
as 1:2023cv23101
Petitioner:
JUAN CARLOS CASTILLO-VAZQUEZ
Respondent:
WARDEN
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
GARCIA v. RACHEL THOMPSON, WARDEN
as 1:2023cv23175
Petitioner:
ALEXANDER ZAPATA GARCIA
Respondent:
RACHEL THOMPSON, WARDEN
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
BELL JR v. UNITED STATES et al
as 3:2023cv23009
Petitioner:
SHANNON BELL JR
Respondent:
UNITED STATES, MERCER COUNTY, WARDEN OF MCCC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
CASTINE v. WARDEN
as 1:2024cv00515
Petitioner:
THEODORE J. CASTINE
Respondent:
WARDEN
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
MAXWELL v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
as 1:2023cv23001
Petitioner:
JOHN MAXWELL
Respondent:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentenc
HEMRIC, JR., v. THOMPSON
as 1:2023cv22634
Petitioner:
ALFRED P. HEMRIC, JR.,
Respondent:
RACHEL THOMPSON
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
DOUGHERTY v. WYSOL et al
as 1:2023cv22744
Petitioner:
KEITH DOUGHERTY
Respondent:
GEORGE WYSOL, JUDGE DIAMOND, JUDGE WOLSON and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
JUSTO v. Warden FCI Fort Dix
as 2:2024cv00235
Petitioner:
STEVEN JUSTO
Defendant:
Warden FCI Fort Dix
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
CLEVELAND v. DAVIS et al
as 2:2023cv23311
Petitioner:
RAHEEM CLEVELAND
Respondent:
BRUCE DAVIS and THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE STATE OF NEW JERSEY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
GREENE v. CHARLES
as 2:2023cv23364
Petitioner:
GEORGE GREENE
Respondent:
RON CHARLES
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
