Cases 81 - 90 of 4,079
Woody v. Matteson et al
as 3:2023cv00549
Petitioner:
Guy Woody
Respondent:
Gigi Matteson and Rob Bonta
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Bush v. Matteson et al
as 3:2023cv00490
Petitioner:
Anthony Arthur Bush
Respondent:
G. Matteson and Rob Bonta
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Tony Lomeli v. Brian Birkholz
as 3:2023cv00448
Plaintiff:
Tony Lomeli
Defendant:
Brian Birkholz
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 fd Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federal)
Bruestle v. Warden et al
as 3:2023cv00447
Petitioner:
Mark Joseph Don Bruestle
Respondent:
Warden and Attorney General
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Williams v. Fisher
as 3:2023cv00423
Petitioner:
Tommy Lee Williams
Respondent:
Raythel Fisher
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Rudy Cazarez v. Brian Birkholz et al
as 3:2023cv00339
Plaintiff:
Rudy Cazarez
Defendant:
Brian Birkholz and Bureau of Prisons
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 fd Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federal)
Hooks v. Madden et al
as 3:2023cv00311
Petitioner:
Da Ron Hooks
Respondent:
R. Madden and People of the State of California
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Hawkins v. San Diego County Jail
as 3:2023cv00267
Petitioner:
Christopher Todd Hawkins
Respondent:
San Diego County Jail
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Jones v. Supreme Court
as 3:2023cv00238
Petitioner:
Wayne E. Jones
Respondent:
Supreme Court
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Jones v. Oceanside Police Department
as 3:2023cv00237
Petitioner:
Wayne E. Jones
Respondent:
Oceanside Police Department
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
