Cases 81 - 90 of 165
Smith et al v. Schwarzenegger et al
as 2:2013at01236
Plaintiff:
Corey Lamar Smith , Dion Barnett , Christopher Garner and others
Defendant:
Arnold Schwarzenegger, Jeffrey A. Beard, Paul D. Brazelton and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1343
Kamal K Roy v. US American Democracy et al
as 2:2013cv05361
Plaintiff:
The Rev Dr Kamal K Roy
Defendant:
US American Democracy and USA
v. Social Security Commission
as 2:2013at00336
Defendant:
Social Security Commission
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWW)
Judd v. Obama et al
as 2:2013cv00537
Plaintiff:
Keith Judd
Defendant:
Barack Obama, Deborah Bowen and Democratic Party of California
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2201
Haw v. Howard
as 3:2013cv00357
Plaintiff:
Jeffrey Haw
Defendant:
John Howard
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal
Gavin v. Arntz et al
as 4:2013cv00056
Plaintiff:
Lynn Gavin
Defendant:
John Arntz, Edwin Mah Lee, Sean Elsbernd and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981 Civil Rights
Grinols et al v. Electoral College et al
as 2:2012at01587
Plaintiff:
James Grinols , Robert Odden , Edward Noonan and others
Defendant:
Electoral College, President of the Senate, Governor of California and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Grinols et al v. Electoral College et al
as 2:2012cv02997
Plaintiff:
James Grinols , Robert Odden , Edward Noonan and others
Defendant:
Electoral College , President of the Senate , Governor of California and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Keith Judd et al v. Barack Obama et al
as 8:2012cv01888
Defendant:
Michael Astrue, John Avlon, Ballot Law Commission of State of New Hampshire and others
Plaintiff:
David Farrar, Keith Judd, Leah Lax and others
Pepper Draper et al v State of Arizona et al
as 8:2012cv01602
Plaintiff:
Grant Abbot, William O Abright, Justin Ahrens and others
Defendant:
State of Indiana, State of Texas, State of Alabama and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
