Cases 1 - 10 of 21
Windham v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 9:2023cv00197
Plaintiff:
Amy Windham
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 205 Denial Social Security Benefits
Cohen v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 5:2023cv00973
Plaintiff:
Amy Melissa Cohen
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWW)
Hicks v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 3:2023cv01530
Plaintiff:
Amy M Hicks
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security
Interested Party:
Social Security Administration - Interested Party
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWW)
Young v. Commissioner, Social Security Administration
as 5:2022cv00245
Plaintiff:
Amy Kathryn Young
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security and Commissioner, Social Security Administration
Interested Party:
Social Security Administration - Interested Party
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWW)
Patrick v. Kijakazi
as 5:2022cv00716
Plaintiff:
Amy Dee Patrick
Defendant:
Kilolo Kijakazi
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWC)
Fuller v. Kijakazi
as 3:2022cv00133
Plaintiff:
Amy Fuller
Defendant:
Kilolo Kijakazi
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 205 Denial Social Security Benefits
Ballidis v. Social Security Administration Commissioner
as 4:2021cv00402
Plaintiff:
Amy Ballidis
Defendant:
Social Security Administration Commissioner
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 205
Ballidis v. Commissioner SSA
as 4:2021cv00403
Plaintiff:
Amy Ballidis
Defendant:
Social Security Administration Commissioner
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 205
Patrick v. Saul
as 5:2020cv00637
Defendant:
Andrew M. Saul
Plaintiff:
Amy Dee Patrick
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
Edmisten v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 5:2019cv00006
Plaintiff:
Amy L. Edmisten
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security
Interested Party:
Social Security Administration - Interested Party
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
