Cases 1 - 10 of 219
John Doe (RWC) v. Lee et al
as 3:2024cv00421
Plaintiff:
John Doe (RWC)
Defendant:
William B. Lee and David B. Rausch
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2201 Constitutionality of State Statute(s)
Doe (WDM) v. Lee et al
as 3:2024cv00373
Plaintiff:
John Doe (WDM)
Defendant:
William B. Lee and David B. Rausch
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Doe #1 (ELA) et al v. Lee et al
as 3:2024cv00361
Plaintiff:
John Doe #1 (ELA), John Doe #2 (BMA), John Doe #3 (RNB) and others
Defendant:
William B. Lee and David B. Rausch
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Gilliam v. Prince Health Group LLC et al
as 1:2024cv00033
Plaintiff:
William Steven Gilliam
Defendant:
Prince Health Group LLC and John Doe Lead Generator Identified as "P1 Solutions"
Cause Of Action: 47 U.S.C. § 227 Restrictions of Use of Telephone Equipment
John Doe #1 (EDB) et al v. Lee et al
as 3:2024cv00266
Plaintiff:
John Doe #1 (EDB) and John Doe #2 (WEB)
Defendant:
William B. Lee and David B. Rausch
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2201 Constitutionality of State Statute(s)
Western Express, Inc. et al v. Cathey et al
as 2:2024cv02139
Plaintiff:
Western Express, Inc., MHT Group, Inc. and Church Transportation & Logistics, Inc.
Defendant:
Colton Ahmad Cathey, CAC Operations, LLC, A-1's Towing & Hauling, LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1961 Racketeering (RICO) Act
Doe (WEA) v. Lee et al
as 3:2024cv00249
Plaintiff:
John Doe (WEA)
Defendant:
William B. Lee and David B. Rausch
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Doe #1 (LWB) et al v. Lee et al
as 3:2024cv00186
Plaintiff:
John Doe #1 (LWB), John Doe #2 (DBB) and John Doe #3 (BAR)
Defendant:
William B. Lee and David B. Rausch
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Doe (DJB) v. Lee et al
as 3:2024cv00144
Plaintiff:
John Doe (DJB)
Defendant:
William B. Lee and David B. Rausch
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
