Cases 1 - 4 of 4
Blankson v. ACMH Inc. et al
as 1:2021cv04114
Plaintiff:
Kobe Adjei Blankson
Defendant:
ACMH Inc., Well Life Network, Human Resource Administration Public Assistance Agency and others
Cause Of Action: 49 U.S.C. § 781 Forfeiture
United States v. Real Property Commonly Known, et al
as 17-5011
Plaintiff - Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant:
REAL PROPERTY COMMONLY KNOWN AS 7208 EAST 65TH PLACE, TULSA, OKLAHOMA, REAL PROPERTY COMMONLY KNOWN AS 10711 SOUTH SHERIDIAN ROAD, TULSA, OKLAHOMA, REAL PROPERTY COMMONLY KNOWN AS 10716 SOUTH 66TH EAST AVENUE, TULSA, OKLAHOMA and others
Claimant:
MAUREEN LONG, JOHN JOSHUA LYONS, CAMELOT CANCER CENTER, INC. and others
Claimant - Appellant:
HEATHER LEMMERMAN LYONS
United States of America v. Real Property Commonly Known As 7208 East 65th Place, Tulsa, Oklahoma et al
as 4:2015cv00324
Plaintiff:
United States of America
Defendant:
Real Property Commonly Known As 7208 East 65th Place, Tulsa, Oklahoma, Real Property Commonly Known As 10711 South Sheridian Road, Tulsa, Oklahoma, Real Property Commonly Known As 10716 South 66th East Avenue, Tulsa, Oklahoma and others
Cause Of Action: 21 U.S.C. § 881
USA v. 8 Gilcrease Lane, Quincy, Flor, et al
as 10-5061
Plaintiff - Appellee:
United States of America
Defendant - Appellee:
8 Gilcrease Lane, Quincy, Florida 32351, One Condo Located On North Ocean Boulevard In Myrtle Beach, South Carolina and All Funds Including Approximately $53 Million, On Deposit At Bank Of America Accounts Of (1) Thomas A. Bowdoin, Jr., , (2) Clarence Busby, Jr. & Dawn Stowers,& (3) Golden Panda Ad Builder, Thomas A. Bowdoin, Jr., Sole Proprietor, dba Adsurfdaily; Clarenc
Claimant - Appellant:
Adsurfdaily, Inc., Thomas A. Bowdoin and Bowdoin Harris Enterprises, Inc.
Claimant - Appellee:
Golden Panda Ad Builder, Clarence Busby, Michael Haws and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
