Cases 1 - 10 of 29
INGRAM v. COMMISSIONER OF SOCIAL SECURITY
as 1:2023cv00130
Plaintiff:
SARAH INGRAM
Defendant:
COMMISSIONER OF SOCIAL SECURITY
Not Classified By Court:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA (NOTICE)
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWC)
Keeler v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 3:2022cv01176
Plaintiff:
Sarah Keeler
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security
Interested Party:
SSA
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWC)
Carter v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 6:2022cv01438
Plaintiff:
Sarah Ann Carter and Sarah A. Carter
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security
Interested Party:
SSA
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 206 Social Security Benefits
Magaw v. Kijakazi
as 1:2022cv02460
Plaintiff:
Jenny Sarah Magaw
Defendant:
Kilolo Kijakazi
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWW)
Harper v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 6:2022cv00709
Plaintiff:
Sarah Jane Harper
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security
Interested Party:
SSA
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWC)
Dennis v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 3:2020cv01316
Plaintiff:
Sarah Dennis
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security
Interested Party:
SSA
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 402
Gibby v. Saul
as 1:2020cv00059
Defendant:
Andrew Saul
Plaintiff:
Sarah J. Gibby
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
Mercer v. Cyrus et al
as 0:2019cv62404
Defendant:
Judge Thurman Anderson and Judge Sarah Cyrus
Plaintiff:
Belinda Lee Mercer
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 0205
Chamblis v. Commissioner, Social Security Administration
as 1:2019cv02045
Defendant:
Commissioner, Social Security Administration
Plaintiff:
Sarah Chamblis
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
Magaw v. Commissioner, Social Security Administration
as 2:2019cv00085
Plaintiff:
Jenny Sarah Magaw
Defendant:
Commissioner, Social Security Administration
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
