Cases 11 - 20 of 177
Bolling-Carlisle v. Knight Adjustment Bureau Inc
as 4:2023cv00970
Plaintiff:
Sarah Bolling-Carlisle
Defendant:
Knight Adjustment Bureau Inc
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
Bolling-Carlisle v. US Collections West Inc
as 4:2023cv00968
Plaintiff:
Sarah Bolling-Carlisle
Defendant:
US Collections West Inc
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2023cv03199
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681 Fair Credit Reporting Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2023cv02988
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 6:2023cv01197
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681 Fair Credit Reporting Act
Magdaleno v. Morgan Fidelity Associates, Inc.
as 0:2023cv60923
Plaintiff:
Sarah Magdaleno
Defendant:
Morgan Fidelity Associates, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 47 U.S.C. § 227 Restrictions of Use of Telephone Equipment
Monetti v. Monetti et al
as 1:2023cv21786
Plaintiff:
Francesca Monetti
Defendant:
Sarah Monetti and Yvette Zorrilla
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1961 Racketeering (RICO) Act
Monetti v. Monetti et al
as 1:2023cv21789
Plaintiff:
Francesca Monetti
Defendant:
Sarah Monetti, Yvette Zorrilla, YVZO Inc and others
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1962 Racketeering (RICO) Act
Whitechurch et al v. Mulkey et al
as 4:2023cv00489
Plaintiff:
Darin Whitechurch, Julie Whitechurch, Darin Whitchurch and others
Defendant:
Michael Danny Mulkey, Sarah Mulkey, Robin Mulkey and others
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1964 Racketeering (RICO) Act
UnCommon Fashion, Inc. v. Sofie the Label, LLC et al
as 1:2022cv04273
Plaintiff:
UnCommon Fashion, Inc.
Defendant:
Sofie the Label, LLC, Sarah Yoon and Stephen Wong
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
