Cases 11 - 20 of 288
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2023cv00072
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 08 U.S.C. § 1329 Writ of Mandamus to Adjudicate Visa Petiti
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2022cv03643
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 0706 Judicial Review of Agency Actions
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2022cv03579
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Not Classified By Court:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 0555 b Agency Decision - Right to Counsel
CHISHTI et al v. SPOTTISWOODE et al
as 1:2022cv03490
Plaintiff:
ZIA CHISHTI and SARAH POBERESKIN
Defendant:
TATIANA SPOTTISWOODE, JAMES SPOTTISWOODE, NANCY ERIKA SMITH and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Libel,Assault,Slander
REIDA v. GENERAL SERVICES ADMINISTRATION
as 1:2022cv03502
Plaintiff:
SARAH C. REIDA
Defendant:
GENERAL SERVICES ADMINISTRATION
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 552 Freedom of Information Act
COX v. DEWEES et al
as 1:2022mc00113
Petitioner:
VALENCIA-MARIE COX
Respondent:
ROBERT DEWEES III, GREG DALY, JAY SMITH and others
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2022cv03312
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981 Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2022cv02901
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 8 U.S.C. § 1446 Petition for Naturalization Hearing
SHEKAR v. DUFF et al
as 1:2022cv02123
Defendant:
STEVE GILMAN, JOAQUIN ARCHIVALDO GUZMAN, JAMES DUFF and others
Plaintiff:
ROGER SHEKAR
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2022cv01924
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Not Classified By Court:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 0555 b Agency Decision - Right to Counsel
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
