Cases 21 - 30 of 259
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2022cv00148
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
Logicalis, Inc. . v. Centergrid, LLC et al
as 2:2021cv12894
Plaintiff:
Logicalis, Inc. .
Defendant:
Centergrid, LLC, Bob Chapp, Sarah Harrison and others
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2021cv02238
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 47 U.S.C. § 227
Seanderyl Crawford v. City of Detroit, MI, et al
as 21-1734
Plaintiff / Appellant:
SEANDERYL CRAWFORD
Defendant / Appellee:
CITY OF DETROIT, MI, DETROIT, MI POLICE DEPARTMENT, HEIDI E. WASHINGTON, Director and others
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2021cv02055
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
Lamar Burton v. MDOC, et al
as 21-1647
Plaintiff / Appellant:
LAMAR BURTON
Defendant / Appellee:
MICHIGAN DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS, GREGORY SKIPPER, Former Warden, TIMOTHY FIELD, Correction Officer and others
Lamar Burton v. MDOC, et al
as 21-1641
Plaintiff / Appellant:
LAMAR BURTON
Defendant / Appellee:
MICHIGAN DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS, COREY GRAHN, N.P. of Corizon, BRYAN DEEREN, RUM of Corizon and others
William Virgil v. City of Newport, KY, et al
as 21-5968
Plaintiff / Appellant:
WILLIAM R. VIRGIL
Defendant / Appellee:
CITY OF NEWPORT, KY, et al., NORM WAGNER, Newport Police Officer, CITY OF CINCINNATI, OH and others
Defendant:
MARK BRANDT, CITY OF NORWOOD, OHIO, PAT MOORE and others
Travis LongmireIn re: Travis Longmire
as 21-1603
Petitioner:
In re: TRAVIS SANTELL LONGMIRE
Respondent:
SARAH SCHROEDER, Warden
Seanderyl Crawford v. City of Detroit, MI, et al
as 21-2991
Plaintiff / Appellant:
SEANDERYL CRAWFORD
Defendant / Appellee:
CITY OF DETROIT, MI, DETROIT, MI POLICE DEPARTMENT, HEIDI E. WASHINGTON, Director and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
