Cases 1 - 10 of 77,389
WALKER v. PATE
as 5:2024cv00099
Plaintiff:
AMOS WALKER
Defendant:
PATE
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
WALKER v. DIXON et al
as 4:2024cv00221
Plaintiff:
JESSE ALAN WALKER
Defendant:
RICKY DIXON, JAMES COKER, TIMOTHY NOLES and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
EVANS v. ARCH
as 2:2024cv14158
Plaintiff:
ROGER VON EVANS
Defendant:
CAREN L ARCH, BROWN, RICKY DIXON and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Jones, Brent M. v. Yarusso et al
as 1:2024cv21958
Plaintiff:
Brent Michael Jones and Brent Micheal Jones
Defendant:
A. Yarusso, H. Fitoria, B. Campos and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights
Robinson, Vanerren v. Warden et al
as 2:2024cv14159
Plaintiff:
Vanerren E. Robinson and Vandareen E. Robinson
Defendant:
Warden and Z. Culpepper
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 State Prisoner Civil Rights
Owens, Kevin v. Florida Department of Corrections et al
as 1:2024cv21941
Plaintiff:
Kevin M Owens
Defendant:
Florida Department of Corrections, Warden Acosta, Warden Lamb and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 State Prisoner Civil Rights
Aragones v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
as 5:2024cv00260
Petitioner:
Nelson Aragones
Respondent:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
WARD v. SULSBERRY
as 4:2024cv00217
Petitioner:
BRANDY LEE WARD
Respondent:
SULSBERRY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
ROSARIO v. MOODY et al
as 4:2024cv00215
Plaintiff:
JEFREY ROSARIO
Defendant:
ASHLEY MOODY and RICKY D DIXON
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
MCMILLIAN v. JONES et al
as 4:2024cv00216
Plaintiff:
XAVIER T MCMILLIAN
Defendant:
DELDRON JONES, BRANDON GRANGER and ISAAC REDDING
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
