Cases 1 - 10 of 12
Bolle v. Davol, Inc et al
as 2:2021cv01650
Defendant:
Davol, Inc and C.R. Bard, Inc
Plaintiff:
Joe Bolle
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Bolling v. Warden, London Correctional Institution
as 3:2020cv00167
Respondent:
Warden, London Correctional Institution
Petitioner:
Anthony K. Bolling
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Harrison v. City of Cleveland, Ohio, et al.
as 1:2019cv02328
Defendant:
Alan Furtado, Stephens, #5531, Timothy Holt, #5715 and others
Plaintiff:
Administrator John R. Harrison and John R. Harrison
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Boll v. C.R. Bard, Inc. et al
as 2:2019cv03225
Plaintiff:
Kimberly Boll
Defendant:
Davol, Inc. and C.R. Bard, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Boll v. Midland Credit Management, Inc.
as 2:2018cv01461
Plaintiff:
Lynn Boll
Defendant:
Midland Credit Management, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
Bolling v. Morgan
as 3:2013cv00116
Petitioner:
Anthony K. Bolling
Respondent:
Donald Morgan
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2011cv00976
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
Jamison et al v. DePuy Orthopaedics, Inc. et al
as 1:2011dp21534
Plaintiff:
Bolling H. Jamison, Sr. and Victoria Jamison
Defendant:
DePuy Orthopaedics, Inc. , DePuy Inc. , DePuy International Limited and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Bolling et al v. Abernathy et al
as 1:2011cv00078
Plaintiff:
Donald B Bolling , Christopher Archiable , Kevin Broxterman and others
Defendant:
Nick Abernathy, Joshua Querry, Timothy Hardy and others
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 185
Bolling v. Warden, Lebanon Correctional Institute
as 3:2010cv00114
Petitioner:
Anthony K. Bolling
Respondent:
Warden, Lebanon Correctional Institute
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
