Cases 1 - 10 of 29
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2023cv00630
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Chung v. Kijakazi
as 1:2023cv00619
Plaintiff:
Sheila Chung
Defendant:
Comm'r Soc. Sec Kilolo Kijakazi and Kilolo Kijakazi
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 416 Denial of Social Security Benefits
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2023cv00603
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Chung v. JB Brothers, Inc., et al
as 1:2023cv00055
Plaintiff:
Jaewoo Chung
Defendant:
JB Brothers, Inc., a California corporation, Kwang S. Lim, JB Brothers, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Breach of Contract
v. Chung et al
as 1:2023cv00054
Defendant:
Kwang S. Lim, Jaewoo Chung, JB Brothers, Inc., a California corporation and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Breach of Contract
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2020cv00495
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e
Chung v. United States of America
as 1:2020cv00450
Plaintiff:
Nicholas Chung and Candy Kim Loan Chung
Defendant:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1402
Chung v. Hawaiian Isles Kona Coffee Company, LTD.
as 1:2020cv00158
Plaintiff:
Andrew Chung
Defendant:
Hawaiian Isles Kona Coffee Company, LTD.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Kim v. United States of America
as 1:2020cv00006
Plaintiff:
Tom Chung Yul Kim and Government Employees Insurance Company
Defendant:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1346
Chung v. Vistana Vacation Ownership, Inc. et al
as 1:2018cv00469
Defendant:
Starwood Hotels & Resorts Worldwide, LLC and Vistana Vacation Ownership, Inc.
Plaintiff:
Keicy Chung
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
