Cases 1 - 10 of 10
Flowers (PS) v. No Named Respondent
as 1:2024cv00963
Petitioner:
Kenyatta Flowers
Respondent:
No Named Respondent
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 fd - Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Flowers v. Larimer County Detention Center et al
as 1:2023cv00465
Plaintiff:
Dukhan Flowers
Defendant:
Larimer County Detention Center, Manchosher, J. Berry and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Flowers v. Doe et al
as 1:2023cv00389
Plaintiff:
Dukhan D. Flowers
Defendant:
Larimer County Detention Center, Jane Doe, John Doe and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Flowers v. Larimer County Sheriffs Office
as 1:2022cv00940
Plaintiff:
Dukhan D. Flowers
Defendant:
Larimer County Sheriffs Office
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Flowers v. People of the State of Colorado
as 1:2019cv01556
Plaintiff:
DeMario Andre Flowers
Defendant:
No Named Defendants and People of the State of Colorado
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Dunlap v. Raemisch et al
as 1:2013cv03117
Plaintiff:
Nathan Jerard Dunlap
Defendant:
Rick Raemisch, Rick (I) Raemisch, Mark Flowers and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Aurit v. Medina et al
as 1:2013cv02426
Plaintiff:
Todd A Aurit
Defendant:
Angel Medina, Loe Archuleta, Ron Wagner and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Flowers v. Correction Corporation of America et al
as 1:2012cv00277
Plaintiff:
Jackie Flowers
Defendant:
Correction Corporation of America, Brigham Sloan, Brigham (I) Sloan and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Flowers v. Slone et al
as 1:2011cv02940
Petitioner:
Jackie L. Flowers
Respondent:
Brigham Slone and Attorney General of the State of Colorado, The
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Key v. McLaughlin et al
as 1:2010cv00103
Plaintiff:
David Key
Defendant:
Scott (I) McLaughlin, Scott McLaughlin, Joe (I) Williams and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
