Cases 1 - 10 of 44
FLOWERS v. GOODMAN
as 1:2024cv01177
Plaintiff:
ZACHARY FLOWERS
Defendant:
AL GOODMAN
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
FLOWERS v. WEINER
as 1:2024cv01178
Plaintiff:
ZACHARY FLOWERS
Defendant:
RICKIE WEINER
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
FLOWERS v. CLARY
as 1:2024cv01179
Plaintiff:
ZACHARY FLOWERS
Defendant:
RAYMOND CLARY
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
FLOWERS v. SWARTZ
as 1:2024cv01181
Plaintiff:
ZACHARY FLOWERS
Defendant:
CONRAD SWARTZ
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
FLOWERS v. PLYMOUTH ROCK INSURANCE
as 1:2024cv01180
Plaintiff:
ZACHARY FLOWERS
Defendant:
PLYMOUTH ROCK INSURANCE
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
SHANNON MEDICAL CENTER et al v. BECERRA
as 1:2024cv00935
Plaintiff:
SHANNON MEDICAL CENTER, DCH REGIONAL MEDICAL CENTER, SONOMA VALLEY HOSPITAL and others
Defendant:
XAVIER BECERRA
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 702 Administrative Procedure Act
BURNS v. STERLING STFH et al
as 1:2023cv02037
Plaintiff:
THOMAS DENNIS BURNS, SR.
Defendant:
STERLING STFH, VIRGINIA WILLIAMS FAMILY CENTER, ROSLYNN WHITMIRE and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
BURNS v. STERLING STFH et al
as 1:2023cv02023
Plaintiff:
THOMAS DENNIS BURNS, SR.
Defendant:
STERLING STFH, VIRGINIA WILLIAMS FAMILY CENTER, ROSLYNN WHITMIRE and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
HARTSELLE MEDICAL CENTER et al v. BECERRA
as 1:2023cv00840
Plaintiff:
HARTSELLE MEDICAL CENTER, DEKALB MEDICAL CENTER, STRINGFELLOW MEMORIAL HOSPITAL and others
Defendant:
XAVIER BECERRA
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 0706 Judicial Review of Agency Actions
GRENADIER v. WELLS FARGO BANK NATIONAL (WFB) ASSOCIATION et al
as 1:2022cv00743
Defendant:
BANK OF AMERICA, OCWEN LOAN SERVICING, LLC, ALTISOURCE SOLUTIONS, INC and others
Plaintiff:
JANICE WOLK GRENADIER
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
