Cases 1 - 10 of 37
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2023cv23582
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12182 Americans with Disabilities Act
FONG v. 3M COMPANY
as 3:2023cv11286
Plaintiff:
SONNY FONG
Defendant:
3M COMPANY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
FONG v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 7:2021cv47339
Plaintiff:
FREDDIE FONG
Defendant:
3M COMPANY, 3M OCCUPATIONAL SAFETY LLC, AEARO HOLDING LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
FONG v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 9:2020cv15219
Defendant:
AEARO HOLDING LLC, AEARO INTERMEDIATE LLC, AEARO TECHNOLOGIES LLC and others
Plaintiff:
MICAH FONG
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
YANG v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 8:2020cv85145
Plaintiff:
FONG KENT YANG
Defendant:
3M OCCUPATIONAL SAFETY LLC, AEARO INTERMEDIATE LLC, AEARO TECHNOLOGIES LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
VAVRA-FONG v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 8:2020cv56898
Plaintiff:
JONATHAN RICHARD VAVRA-FONG
Defendant:
AEARO HOLDING LLC, AEARO INTERMEDIATE LLC, AEARO TECHNOLOGIES LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
FONG v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 8:2020cv40375
Defendant:
3M OCCUPATIONAL SAFETY LLC, AEARO INTERMEDIATE LLC, AEARO TECHNOLOGIES LLC and others
Plaintiff:
JACKSON LEI FONG
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
FONG v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 7:2020cv73080
Defendant:
AEARO HOLDING LLC, AEARO INTERMEDIATE LLC, AEARO TECHNOLOGIES LLC and others
Plaintiff:
ERNEST FONG
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Kelley v. Fong et al
as 2:2019cv14171
Defendant:
Pam Randhan, Jothia, Alexzandra and others
Plaintiff:
Regina Lee Kelley
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983
Fong Kai Business Group Co., LTD v. Shade Saver, Inc., d/b/a Optic Wash, Inc. et al
as 5:2018cv00540
Defendant:
Bryan Myers and Shade Saver, Inc., d/b/a Optic Wash, Inc.
Plaintiff:
Fong Kai Business Group Co., LTD
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
