Cases 1 - 10 of 5,459
Rice v. Subkit, Inc.
as 1:2024cv03731
Plaintiff:
John Curtis Rice
Defendant:
Subkit, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 17 U.S.C. § 501 Copyright Infringement
Le Brecht, II v. The Upper Deck Company et al
as 1:2024cv01679
Plaintiff:
Michael J. Le Brecht, II
Defendant:
The Upper Deck Company, Fanatics, LLC and JOHN DOES 1-10
Cause Of Action: 17 U.S.C. § 101 Copyright Infringement
Rice v. Fusion Physical Therapy and Sports Wellness, P.C.
as 1:2024cv03377
Plaintiff:
John Curtis Rice
Defendant:
Fusion Physical Therapy and Sports Wellness, P.C.
Cause Of Action: 17 U.S.C. § 501 Copyright Infringement
Strike 3 Holdings, LLC v. Doe
as 1:2024cv01711
Plaintiff:
Strike 3 Holdings, LLC
Defendant:
John Doe
Cause Of Action: 17 U.S.C. § 101 Copyright Infringement
Fletcher et al v. Niang et al
as 1:2024cv01913
Plaintiff:
Bryan Fletcher and Garrett Fletcher
Defendant:
Abdoulaye Niang, Alexander Niang, Mewza LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1051 Trademark Infringement
Neu Productions Inc. et al v. Eureka Entertainment LLC et al
as 1:2024cv01694
Plaintiff:
Neu Productions Inc., Roderick Robert John, Patrick Parnell and others
Defendant:
Eureka Entertainment LLC and Home Box Office, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 17 U.S.C. § 101 Copyright Infringement
Strike 3 Holdings, LLC v. Doe
as 3:2024cv00597
Plaintiff:
Strike 3 Holdings, LLC
Defendant:
John Doe
Cause Of Action: 17 U.S.C. § 101 Copyright Infringement
Strike 3 Holdings, LLC v. John Doe
as 1:2024cv00588
Plaintiff:
Strike 3 Holdings, LLC
Defendant:
John Doe
Cause Of Action: 17 U.S.C. § 101 Copyright Infringement
Strike 3 Holdings, LLC v. Doe
as 1:2024cv00592
Plaintiff:
Strike 3 Holdings, LLC
Defendant:
John Doe
Cause Of Action: 17 U.S.C. § 101 Copyright Infringement
Strike 3 Holdings, LLC v. John Doe
as 5:2024cv00593
Plaintiff:
Strike 3 Holdings, LLC
Defendant:
John Doe
Cause Of Action: 17 U.S.C. § 101 Copyright Infringement
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
