Cases 1 - 10 of 750
United States Securities and Exchange Commission v. Poerio
as 2:2024cv00700
Plaintiff:
United States Securities and Exchange Commission
Defendant:
Frank T. Poerio, Jr.
Cause Of Action: 12 U.S.C. § 22 Securities Fraud
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2024cv01973
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681 Fair Credit Reporting Act
Theall v. FCA US LLC
as 2:2024cv01892
Plaintiff:
Howard I Theall, Jr
Defendant:
FCA US LLC
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 2301 Magnuson-Moss Warranty Act
MCCOMBS v. NORFOLK SOUTHERN CORPORATION et al
as 2:2024cv00559
Petitioner:
Thomas McCombs, Jr.
Defendant:
NORFOLK SOUTHERN CORPORATION, Norfolk Souther Railway Systems and Norfolk Southern Railway Systems Lines
Cause Of Action: 09 U.S.C. § 1 U.S. Arbitration Act
AAMCO TRANSMISSIONS, LLC, f/k/a/ AAMCO TRANSMISSIONS, INC. v. BELL, JR.
as 2:2024cv01357
Petitioner:
AAMCO TRANSMISSIONS, LLC, f/k/a/ AAMCO TRANSMISSIONS, INC.
Respondent:
BILL BELL, JR.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Breach of Contract
LU v. KERRY et al
as 2:2024cv01169
Plaintiff:
FRIEDRICH LU
Defendant:
CAMERON F KERRY, UNITED STATES, MERRICK GARLAND and others
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1962 Racketeering (RICO) Act
Woodbury Financial Services, Inc. v. Joseph Michael Cucinotta SR., et. al.
as 2:2024cv00541
Plaintiff:
Woodbury Financial Services, Inc.
Defendant:
Joseph Michael Cucinotta SR. and Joseph Michael Cucinotta JR.
EQT PRODUCTION COMPANY et al v. THISTLE et al
as 2:2024cv00112
Petitioner:
EQT PRODUCTION COMPANY and RICE DRILLING B LLC
Respondent:
HAROLD W THISTLE, JR and GAY E THISTLE
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Other
Bluebeck Holdings, Ltd. v. SWN Production Company, LLC et al
as 3:2023cv02095
Plaintiff:
Bluebeck Holdings, Ltd.
Defendant:
SWN Production Company, LLC, Southwestern Energy Company, SWN Energy Services Company, LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1964 Racketeering (RICO) Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
