Cases 21 - 30 of 165
Rodrigues v. GlaxoSmithKline et al
as 3:2023cv15728
Plaintiff:
Rui Rodrigues and Maria Rodrigues
Defendant:
GlaxoSmithKline, Patheon Inc., Pfizer Inc and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Rodrigues Lambert v. Lambert
as 1:2023cv20739
Plaintiff:
Michael Rodrigues Lambert
Defendant:
Humberto Lambert
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2023cv20577
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 08 U.S.C. § 1329 Writ of Mandamus to Adjudicate Visa Petition
HANNAH v. 3M COMPANY
as 3:2023cv03875
Plaintiff:
RODRIGUES HANNAH
Defendant:
3M COMPANY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
De Souza et al v. White et al
as 8:2023cv00089
Plaintiff:
Edson Fernandez De Souza, Jr. and Edlene Rodrigues Goulart
Defendant:
Mary Elizabeth White and Harold Traister
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Notice of Removal-Auto Negligence
PURDIMAN v. 3M COMPANY
as 3:2023cv00444
Plaintiff:
RODRIGUS PURDIMAN
Defendant:
3M COMPANY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
RODRIGUES v. 3M COMPANY
as 3:2022cv23307
Plaintiff:
TYLER RODRIGUES
Defendant:
3M COMPANY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
ROBINSON v. LEAVINS et al
as 3:2022cv20805
Plaintiff:
CHARLES M ROBINSON
Defendant:
DONALD LEAVINS, BROWN, HUGHES and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Tolliver v. Dixon et al
as 3:2022cv00871
Plaintiff:
James L. Tolliver
Defendant:
Ricky Dixon, Asbelti Llorens Cordero, Mark Inch and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Patten v. Secretary, Florida Department of Corrections
as 3:2022cv00809
Plaintiff:
Rodrigus Patten
Defendant:
Secretary, Florida Department of Corrections and Secretary, Department of Corrections
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
