Cases 1 - 9 of 9
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2022cv00171
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 8 U.S.C. § 1101 Immigration and Nationality Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2020cv02257
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 070
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2018cv01958
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
WILLIAMS v. USA
as 1:2018cv01418
Respondent:
USA
Petitioner:
RICO RODRIGUS WILLIAMS
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255
NUEVOS DESTINOS, LLC et al v. PECK et al
as 1:2015cv01846
Defendant:
SAMUEL PECK, IGNACIO HARTEN RODRIGUE LARRAIN, MARYSOL SALAZAR and others
Plaintiff:
NUEVOS DESTINOS, LLC , NUEVOS DESTINOS PERU, S.A.C. and WILLIAM P COOK
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1962
FREDO et al v. CHAROEN, INC. et al
as 1:2015cv01735
Plaintiff:
JOSE GODO FREDO and MELVIN YOBANI RODRIGUE ESCALANTE
Defendant:
CHAROEN, INC. and YODCHAI HORCHAROEN
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 216
CHEEKS et al v. FORT MYER CONSTRUCTION CORPORATION, et al
as 1:2014cv00914
Defendant:
FORT MYER CONSTRUCTION CORPORATION , DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA , FRANCISCO RODRIGUES NETO and others
Plaintiff:
JOHN C. CHEEKS , CHEEKS OF NORTH AMERICA, INC. and ONE OR MORE PLAINTIFFS WHO WERE DAMAGED IN THEIR BUSINESS OR PROPERTY BY THE UNLAWFUL TORTIOUS ACTS OF DEFENDANTS HEREIN
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1337
CHEEKS OF NORTH AMERICA, INC. v. FORT MYER CONSTRUCTION CORPORATION et al
as 1:2010cv01746
Plaintiff:
CHEEKS OF NORTH AMERICA, INC.
Defendant:
FORT MYER CONSTRUCTION CORPORATION, FRANCISCO RODRIGUES NETO, JOSE RODRIGUES and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
CHEEKS v. FORT MYER CONSTRUCTION CORPORATION et al
as 1:2009cv02163
Plaintiff:
JOHN C. CHEEKS
Defendant:
FORT MYER CONSTRUCTION CORPORATION, FRANCISCO RODRIGUES NETO, JOSE RODRIGUES and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1 Antitrust Litigation
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
