Cases 1 - 10 of 250
Sanchez-Portillo v. Garland
as 24-1117
Petitioner:
CRISTIAN SANCHEZ-PORTILLO, KAREN YANES-SANTOS, ZOE MATUTE-YANES and others
Respondent:
MERRICK B. GARLAND, UNITED STATES ATTORNEY GENERAL
Franco-Santos v. Garland
as 24-909
Petitioner:
JUAN FRANCO-SANTOS
Respondent:
MERRICK B. GARLAND, UNITED STATES ATTORNEY GENERAL
D.R. v. Santos Bakery, Inc.
as 24-702
Plaintiff:
TOWANA RODRIGUEZ, individually and D.R., an infant by her Mother and Natural Guardian, Towana Rodriguez
Defendant:
SANTOS BAKERY, INC. and WILSON VILLA-TENEMAZA
United States of America v. Amador-Rios (Salvador)
as 24-656
Defendant:
MELVI AMADOR-RIOS, SANTOS AMADOR-RIOS, YAN CARLOS RAMIREZ and others
Not Yet Classified:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
United States of America v. Reid (Soto)
as 24-647
Defendant:
CASWELL SENIOR, DWIGHT REID, CHRISTOPHER ERSKINE and others
Not Yet Classified:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Zavala v. Garland
as 24-496
Petitioner:
SANTOS GLADYS ZAVALA and MARINA ISABEL ZAVALA-ROMERO
Respondent:
MERRICK B. GARLAND, UNITED STATES ATTORNEY GENERAL
United States of America v. Amaya-Sanchez (Hernandez)
as 24-352
Defendant:
EDWIN AMAYA-SANCHEZ, WILLIAMS CASTELLANOS, ELMER ALEXANDER LOPEZ and others
Not Yet Classified:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Santos v. Schroeder
as 24-198
Defendant / Appellee:
Corrections Officer C. KASSEN, Sgt. J. SIRVENT, Lt. G. MASNER and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
FRANCISCO SANTOS
Defendant:
C. J. ROGOFSKY, Lt.
United States of America v. Amador-Rios
as 23-7930
Defendant:
SANTOS AMADOR-RIOS, YAN CARLOS RAMIREZ, ANTONIO SALVADOR and others
Defendant / Appellant:
MELVI AMADOR-RIOS, Letal and Pinky
Not Yet Classified:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Tineo-Santos v. Piccolo
as 23-7901
Petitioner / Appellant:
FRANCISCO TINEO-SANTOS
Respondent / Appellee:
PAUL PICCOLO, Superintendent of Southport Correctional Facility
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
