Cases 1 - 10 of 136
Santos v. Schoenly
as 5:2024cv01597
Plaintiff:
Felipe Santos
Defendant:
Brian R Schoenly
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Tort/Motor Vehicle (P.I.)
Santos v. Novo Nordisk Inc., et al
as 2:2024cv00696
Plaintiff:
Jocelyn Santos
Defendant:
NOVO NORDISK INC., NOVO NORDISK US COMMERCIAL HOLDINGS INC., NOVO NORDISK US HOLDINGS INC. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
PERALTA v. DOS SANTOS et al
as 2:2023cv00324
Defendant:
THIAGO'S CONSTRUCTION LLC, TIAGO DOS SANTOS, TIAGO'S CONSTRUCTION LLC and others
Plaintiff:
JOEL PERALTA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1391 Personal Injury
SANTOS v. WILLIAMS
as 5:2022cv01622
Plaintiff:
KEVIN S. SANTOS, SR.
Defendant:
PAUL WILLIAMS
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Tort/Motor Vehicle (P.I.)
JASTRZEBSKI v. WAND TOPCO, INC et al
as 2:2022cv01030
Plaintiff:
RICHARD JASTRZEBSKI
Defendant:
WAND TOPCO, INC, CALIBER COLLISION CENTERS, AITON DOS SANTOS and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Auto Negligence
AGUILERA et al v. MORGAN et al
as 2:2021cv04071
Plaintiff:
SEBASTIAN AGUILERA and MARIA SANTOS
Defendant:
DAVID H. MORGAN, TITANIUM TRUCKING SERVICES, INC., TITANIUM TRANSPORTATION GROUP, INC. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
JACKSON et al v. SANTOS
as 5:2021cv02269
Plaintiff:
GENETTE M. ALSTON and DONNELL L. JACKSON
Defendant:
ROBERTO M. SANTOS
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Santos-Romero et al v. McDonald
as 3:2021cv00811
Plaintiff:
Olga Sanchez and Juan Santos-Romero
Defendant:
Allision L. McDonald
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
KINGMAN v. SANTOS et al
as 2:2021cv00835
Defendant:
BOHREN'S MOVING & STORAGE, INC. and SIMON SANTOS
Plaintiff:
LARRY KINGMAN
Cause Of Action: 23 U.S.C. § 134
BROWNT v. POTLURI et al
as 4:2020cv02365
Defendant:
Prakash L. Potluri and Maria C. Santos Ignacio
Plaintiff:
Allant B Brownt
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
