Cases 31 - 40 of 50
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2014cv00630
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1651
Smit-Santos v. DePuy Orthopaedics, Inc. et al
as 1:2013dp21126
Plaintiff:
Peta Smit-Santos
Defendant:
DePuy Orthopaedics, Inc. , DePuy, Inc. , Johnson & Johnson and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Baez v. Ohio Department of Rehabilitation & Corrections et al
as 3:2013cv00856
Plaintiff:
Santos Baez
Defendant:
Ohio Department of Rehabilitation & Corrections and Ohio State University Medical Center
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Krysak et al v. Pyramide Transportation, Inc. et al
as 2:2013cv00332
Plaintiff:
Christopher Krysak , Theresa Krysak , Timothy Lindquist and others
Defendant:
Pyramide Transportation, Inc., Fourty Eight States Logistic, Inc. and Ernesto Santos-Santander
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Tort/Motor Vehicle (P.I.)
Santos v. State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Company
as 4:2012cv03040
Plaintiff:
Evelyn W. Santos
Defendant:
State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Insurance Contract
Santos v. United States of America
as 4:2012cv02746
Petitioner:
Ramon-Antonio Santos
Respondent:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1651 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus
Maldonado Santiago v. Commissioner of Social Security Administration
as 1:2012cv01765
Plaintiff:
Santos Maldonado Santiago
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security Administration
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
Marte v. Pugh et al
as 4:2012cv00922
Plaintiff:
Miguel Santos Marte
Defendant:
Michael Pugh, Correction Corporation of America and Northeast Ohio Correctional Center
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Filing Error
as 1:2012dp20182
Plaintiff:
Santos Ruiz, Jr.
Defendant:
DePuy Inc , DePuy International, Ltd. , DePuy Orthopaedics, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
