Cases 1 - 10 of 46
Certain Underwriters at Lloyd's of London v. Joyful Home Health Care, LLC et al
as 0:2024cv02624
Defendant:
Michelle Simpson and Thomas Simpson
Plaintiff:
Certain Underwriters at Lloyd's of London
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Declaratory Judgment
Simpson v. 3M Company et al
as 0:2024cv02503
Defendant:
3M Company and Arizant Healthcare, Inc.
Plaintiff:
James Simpson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 -pip-Diversity-Personal Injury, Product Liability
Simpson v. 3M Company et al
as 0:2023cv02116
Plaintiff:
Kim Simpson
Defendant:
3M Company and Arizant Healthcare, Inc.
Kono et al v. 3M Company
as 0:2023cv00378
Plaintiff:
Casey Kono, David Velasquez, Jonathan Griffith and others
Defendant:
3M Company
Simpson v. Lincoln National Life Insurance Company, The
as 0:2022cv02965
Plaintiff:
Tara Simpson
Defendant:
Lincoln National Life Insurance Company, The
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1132 E.R.I.S.A.-Employee Benefits
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 0:2022cv00933
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 08 U.S.C. § 1329 Writ of Mandamus to Adjudicate Visa Petiti
Simpson v. Unum Life Insurance Company of America
as 0:2022cv00443
Plaintiff:
Brooke Simpson
Defendant:
Unum Life Insurance Company of America
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1132 E.R.I.S.A.-Employee Benefits
Simpson v. 3M Company et al
as 0:2021cv00324
Defendant:
Aearo Holding LLC, Aearo Intermediate LLC, Aearo Technologies LLC and others
Plaintiff:
Raymond Simpson
Signorello et al v. 3M Company et al
as 0:2019cv02214
Plaintiff:
Aearo Intermediate, LLC, Chadwick Sparks, Chill Tanner and others
Defendant:
Aearo Holdings, LLC, 3M Company, 3M Occupational Safety, LLC and others
Alexander et al v. 3M Company et al
as 0:2019cv02174
Plaintiff:
Philip Calligan, Ashley Rivera, James P. McCool and others
Defendant:
Aearo Technologies LLC and 3M Company
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.