Cases 1 - 10 of 11
Towne v. Gardner et al
as 1:2022cv00342
Plaintiff:
Brenda Towne
Defendant:
William Gardner, David Scanlan, Harri Hursti and others
Williams v. Simpson et al
as 1:2022cv00208
Plaintiff:
Stuart A. Williams
Defendant:
Rhonda M. Simpson and Concrete Developments LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Fraud
Simpson v. Atrium Medical Corporation et al
as 1:2020cv00644
Defendant:
Maquet Cardiovascular US Sales, LLC and Atrium Medical Corporation
Plaintiff:
Tammy Simpson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Simpson v. Atrium Medical Corporation et al
as 1:2020cv00589
Plaintiff:
Victoria Simpson
Defendant:
Atrium Medical Corporation and Maquet Cardiovascular US Sales, LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Simpson v. Atrium Medical Corporation et al
as 1:2019cv00946
Defendant:
Maquet Cardiovascular US Sales, LLC, Atrium Medical Corporation and Getinge AB
Plaintiff:
Danielle Simpson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Simpson v. Atrium Medical Corporation et al
as 1:2017cv00537
Defendant:
Atrium Medical Corporation, Getinge AB and Maquet Cardiovascular US Sales, LLC
Plaintiff:
William Simpson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Simpson v. Merrimack County Department of Corrections, Superintendent et al
as 1:2013fp00549
Defendant:
Les Dolecal, Courtney LNU, Rose LNU and others
Plaintiff:
Walter Simpson
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Simpson v. Merrimack County Department of Corrections, Superintendent
as 1:2013cv00556
Defendant:
Merrimack County Department of Corrections, Superintendent
Plaintiff:
Walter Simpson
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Simpson v. Hillsborough County Department of Corrections, Superintendent
as 1:2013fp00342
Defendant:
Hillsborough County Department of Corrections, Superintendent
Plaintiff:
Walter Simpson
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
