Cases 1 - 10 of 11
Pardo v. Neogen Corporation et al
as 1:2022cv00435
Plaintiff:
Erick Pardo
Defendant:
Neogen Corporation, James C. Borel, William T Boehm and others
Smith v. Johnson et al
as 1:2020cv01779
Defendant:
Detective James Tobin and Erika Johnson
Plaintiff:
Frederick W. Smith, Jr.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983
Sabatini v. Corindus Vascular Robotics, Inc. et al
as 1:2019cv01752
Plaintiff:
Eric Sabatini
Defendant:
Nathan R. Harrington, Corindus Vascular Robotics, Inc., Mark J. Toland and others
Wolf v. Engility Holdings, Inc. et al
as 1:2018cv01751
Defendant:
Raptors Merger Sub, Inc., David Topper, Darryll J. Pines and others
Plaintiff:
Jack Wolf
Olsen v. Engility Holdings, Inc. et al
as 1:2018cv01737
Defendant:
Darryll J. Pines, Katharina G. McFarland, Science Applications International Corporation and others
Plaintiff:
Karl Olsen
Tobin v. Bristol-Myers Squibb Co. et al
as 1:2015cv01145
Plaintiff:
Maria Tobin
Defendant:
Bristol-Myers Squibb Co. and Pfizer Inc
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
United States Securities and Exchange Commission v. Veros Partners Inc. et al
as 1:2015mc00130
Plaintiff:
United States Securities and Exchange Commission
Defendant:
Veros Partners Inc., Matthew D. Haab, Jeffrey B. Risinger and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 754
Iron Workers District Council Southern Ohio & Vicinity Pension Trust v. Elliott et al
as 1:2010cv00699
Plaintiff:
Iron Workers District Council Southern Ohio & Vicinity Pension Trust
Defendant:
J. Raymond Elliott, James R. Tobin, Samuel R. Leno and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Tobin-Hadley v. Astrue
as 1:2010cv00189
Plaintiff:
Sally Tobin-Hadley
Defendant:
Michael Astrue
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWC)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2010cv00119
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1125 Trademark Infringement (Lanham Act)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
