Cases 1 - 8 of 8
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2018cv02761
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
KENNEDY v. TRANSWORLD SYSTEMS, INC.
as 1:2018cv00497
Plaintiff:
ALISON KENNEDY
Defendant:
TRANSWORLD SYSTEMS, INC.
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
FAILURE TO COMPLY WITH CONTINUING LEGAL EDUCATION REQUIREMENTS, NONPAYMENT OF ATTORNEY REGISTRATION FEES, AND/OR FAILURE TO SUBMIT IOLTA CERTIFICATION
as 1:2016mc00044
In Re:
FAILURE TO COMPLY WITH CONTINUING LEGAL EDUCATION REQUIREMENTS, NONPAYMENT OF ATTORNEY REGISTRATION FEES, AND/OR FAILURE TO SUBMIT IOLTA CERTIFICATION
Respondent:
JON WINSTON ACKERSON, GARLAN LEIGH ADAMS, BRADLEY JOHNSTON ADAMSKY and others
NESMITH et al v. STEVENS
as 1:2015cv00956
Plaintiff:
ALISON NESMITH and ALPHONSO NESMITH
Defendant:
KATHERINE STEVENS
Interested Party:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1442 Petition for Removal
MAZINDA v. UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND SECURITY et al
as 1:2015cv00752
Defendant:
KAMSING V. LEE, UNITED STATES CITIZENSHIP AND IMMIGRATION SERVICES, UNITED STATES CUSTOMS AND BORDER PROTECTION and others
Interested Party:
Loretta Lynch
Plaintiff:
ALISON S. MAZINDA
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 552 Freedom of Information Act
J & J SPORTS PRODUCTIONS, INC. v. HUBBARD et al
as 1:2013cv01789
Defendant:
ALISON KAY LLC and JOSEPH HUBBARD
Plaintiff:
J & J SPORTS PRODUCTIONS, INC.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed Question: Fed Communications Act of 1
IN RE: FAILURE TO COMPLY
as 1:2013mc00057
Respondent:
JAMES ANDREW LOWES, JOSEPH ALLAN KELLEY, JANA ASHLEY HAGEMAN and others
In Re:
FAILURE TO COMPLY WITH CONTINUING LEGAL EDUCATION REQUIREMENTS, NONPAYMENT OF ATTORNEY REGISTRATION FEES, AND/OR FAILURE TO SUBMIT IOLTA CERTIFICATION
PFEISTER v. THE CINCINNATI INSURANCE COMPANY
as 1:2007mc00060
Plaintiff:
ALISON PFEISTER
Defendant:
THE CINCINNATI INSURANCE COMPANY
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
