Cases 1 - 8 of 8
Ornas et al v. AMAZON.COM. INC. et al
as 5:2024cv00316
Plaintiff:
Deanna Ornas, Estate of Stephen Ornas, Alison Ornas and others
Defendant:
AMAZON.COM. INC., Amazon.com Services, LLC, Amazon.com Sales, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
Barnett v. Biden et al
as 1:2024cv00124
Plaintiff:
Caroline S. Barnett
Defendant:
Joe Biden, Kamala Harris, Federal Agency and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1346 Tort Claim
Rogers v. Car Wash Partners, Inc. dba Mister Car Wash
as 4:2018cv04181
Defendant:
Car Wash Partners, Inc. dba Mister Car Wash
Plaintiff:
Alison S. Rogers
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Maresca et al v. DePuy Orthopaedics Inc et al
as 3:2015cv01161
Plaintiff:
Domenick Maresca and Alison Maresca
Defendant:
DePuy Orthopaedics Inc , DePuy Synthes Products and Johnson & Johnson
Pecial_master:
Special Master
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Kopczynski et al v. DePuy Orthopaedics Inc et al
as 3:2013cv04850
Plaintiff:
Salvatore Kopczynski and Alison Kopczynski
Defendant:
DePuy Orthopaedics Inc , DePuy Products Inc , DePuy International Limited and others
Pecial_master:
Special Master
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Maresca et al v. DePuy Orthopaedics, Inc. et al
as 3:2012cv05150
Plaintiff:
Domenick Maresca and Alison Maresca
Defendant:
DePuy Orthopaedics, Inc. , DePuy, Inc. , Johnson & Johnson and others
Pecial_master:
Special Master
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Miller et al v. Chevron U.S.A. Inc. et al
as 1:2009cv00800
Plaintiff:
Patricia Miller, Christine Goodman and Alison Miller
Defendant:
Chevron U.S.A. Inc. and Texaco Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-(Citizenship)
Shunstrom et al v. Greyhound Lines
as 5:2007cv00019
Plaintiff:
Alison Shunstrom, Stephanie Shores, Francisco Lom and others
Defendant:
Greyhound Lines
Cause Of Action: No cause code entered
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
