Cases 1 - 10 of 256
KING v. HARDDEN et al
as 1:2024cv05442
Plaintiff:
GARY MICHAEL KING
Defendant:
REV. P. HARDDEN, SGT. E. HEADLEY and KESHIA FISHER
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
ALLEN v. KUHN ESQ. et al
as 2:2024cv01167
Plaintiff:
HAKEEM ALLEN
Defendant:
VICTORIA L. KUHN ESQ., PATRICIA MCGILL, MARC SIMS and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
WILLIAMS v. THE NEW JERSEY ATTORNEY GENERAL'S OFFICE et al
as 1:2023cv22771
Plaintiff:
WALTER M. WILLIAMS
Defendant:
THE NEW JERSEY ATTORNEY GENERAL'S OFFICE, VICTORIA L. KUHN and KEISHA FISHER
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
HARRIELL v. FISHER et al
as 1:2023cv21983
Plaintiff:
DAMIAN D. HARRIELL
Defendant:
KEISHA FISHER, OFFICER HARRISON and OFFICER GROSS
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
FISHER v. COUNTY OF MERCER et al
as 3:2023cv20947
Plaintiff:
GREGORY L. FISHER
Defendant:
COUNTY OF MERCER, CHARLES ELLIS and JOHN/JANE DOES 1-10
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Notice of Removal- Civil Rights Act
SMALL v. FISHER et al
as 1:2023cv03685
Plaintiff:
ROBERT L. SMALL
Defendant:
KEISHA FISHER, WILLIE BONDS, DR. S. COLLIER and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
BARNES v. GRIFFITH et al
as 1:2023cv03043
Plaintiff:
JAMES M. BARNES
Defendant:
HEATHER GRIFFITH and KEISHA FISHER
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
RIVERO v. FISHER et al
as 2:2023cv02984
Petitioner:
JULIO C. RIVERO
Respondent:
KEISHA FISHER and ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE STATE OF NEW JERSEY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
BROWN v. HICKS et al
as 1:2023cv02178
Plaintiff:
MICHAEL D. BROWN
Defendant:
MARCUS O. HICKS and KIESHA FISHER
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
BARNES v. FISHER
as 1:2023cv01487
Petitioner:
JAMES A. BARNES
Respondent:
HON. KEVIN T. SMITH and KEISHA FISHER
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
