Cases 1 - 8 of 8
Water Island Merger Arbitrage Institutional Commingled Master Fund LP v. Cornerstone Building Brands, Inc. et al
as 1:2023cv00701
Plaintiff:
Water Island Merger Arbitrage Institutional Commingled Master Fund LP
Defendant:
Cornerstone Building Brands, Inc., George L. Ball, Gary L. Forbes and others
Ables et al v. Ford Motor Company
as 1:2022cv00758
Plaintiff:
Steven Ables, Steven Aguado, Jonathan Alexander and others
Defendant:
Zechariah Adams and Ford Motor Company
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 2301 Magnuson-Moss Warranty Act
Maresh v. Chicago Bridge & Iron Company N.V. et al
as 1:2018cv00238
Plaintiff:
Terry Maresh
Defendant:
Chicago Bridge & Iron Company N.V., Comet I B.V., Comet II B.V. and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 78
In Re: Photochromic Lens Antitrust Litigation
as 1:2014mc00189
Defendant:
Transitions Optical Inc., Essilor International SA, Essilor of America, Inc. and others
Movant:
Holland & Knight
Plaintiff:
Keith Forbes and Brian Keith Roller
Intervenor:
Vision Service Plan
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 2
Durnan et al v. State Of Delaware et al
as 1:2014cv00470
Plaintiff:
Robert F. Durnan , Gerald R. Christian and Mark C. Forbes
Defendant:
State Of Delaware, Department of Justice, Joseph R. Biden, Jr. and others
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201
Smutek v. Perelman et al
as 1:2010cv00392
Plaintiff:
Richard Smutek
Defendant:
Ronald O. Perelman, David L. Kennedy, Alan T. Ennis and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Garofalo v. Revlon Inc. et al
as 1:2009cv01008
Plaintiff:
John Garofalo
Defendant:
Revlon Inc., Ronald O. Perelman, MacAndrews & Forbes Holdings Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 78 m(a) Securities Exchange Act
Bishop et al v. Williams et al
as 1:2008cv00312
Plaintiff:
Samuel Bishop
Defendant:
Quierra Williams, Michael Newman, Pierce and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
