Cases 1 - 10 of 105
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2023cv03401
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Account Receivable
FOX v. JOHNSON & JOHNSON et al
as 1:2023cv02619
Plaintiff:
AMY FOX
Defendant:
JOHNSON & JOHNSON, JOHNSON & JOHNSON HOLDCO (NA) INC., LTL MANAGEMENT LLC. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
HARCO, INC. v. VENTO et al
as 1:2023cv02482
Plaintiff:
HARCO, INC.
Defendant:
ROELL VENTO, LANI ESPARZA, REVOLVER and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
IN RE JEFFREY B. CLARK
as 1:2022mc00117
Respondent:
JEFFREY B. CLARK
Interested Party:
HAMILTON P. FOX, III
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1442 Petition for Removal
CASE NUMBER NOT USED
as 1:2022cv03158
Petitioner:
Mr. HAMILTON P. FOX, III
Respondent:
Mr. Jeffrey B Clark
IN RE: JEFFREY B. CLARK
as 1:2022mc00096
In Re:
JEFFREY B. CLARK
Interested Party:
D.C. BOARD OF PROFESSIONAL RESPONSIBILITY and HAMILTON P. FOX, III
ETIENNE v. SANDERS et al
as 1:2022cv02509
Defendant:
KAREN REA PERKINS, MACHELLE SANDERS, TAMMIE ELAINE HALL and others
Plaintiff:
DINEEN CHERYLANN ETIENNE
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981 Civil Rights
A.O. FOX MEMORIAL HOSPITAL v. BECERRA
as 1:2022cv02346
Plaintiff:
A.O. FOX MEMORIAL HOSPITAL
Defendant:
XAVIER BECERRA
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 0701 Judicial Review of Agency Decision
POMONA FOX THEATER MASTER TENANT LLC v. SMALL BUSINESS ADMINISTRATION et al
as 1:2022cv02073
Plaintiff:
POMONA FOX THEATER MASTER TENANT LLC
Defendant:
SMALL BUSINESS ADMINISTRATION and ISABELLA CASILLAS GUZMAN
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 0706 Judicial Review of Agency Actions
KLAYMAN v. PORTER et al
as 1:2022cv00953
Plaintiff:
LARRY KLAYMAN
Defendant:
JULIA PORTER, HAMILTON FOX III and MATTHEW KAISER
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Petition for Removal
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
