Cases 11 - 20 of 26
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2017cv01232
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000
GOODWIN v. FEDERAL BUREAU OF PRISONS
as 1:2014cv01724
Plaintiff:
WALTER L. GOODWIN
Defendant:
FEDERAL BUREAU OF PRISONS
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 552
CITIZENS CONCERNED FOR TODD COUNTY HEALTH AND WELFARE v. RURAL DEVELOPMENT
as 1:2014cv00810
Defendant:
RURAL DEVELOPMENT
Plaintiff:
CITIZENS CONCERNED FOR TODD COUNTY HEALTH AND WELFARE and AIMEE GOODWIN
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 552
ITPE PENSION FUND et al v. STRONGHOLD SECURITY, LLC
as 1:2013cv00025
Plaintiff:
ITPE PENSION FUND , DENNIS R. ARRINGTON , JERRY M. BOWDEN and others
Defendant:
STRONGHOLD SECURITY, LLC
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1132 E.R.I.S.A.-Employee Benefits
DYDZAK v. SCHWARZENEGGER et al
as 1:2012cv01534
Plaintiff:
DANIEL DAVID DYDZAK
Defendant:
ARNOLD SCHWARZENEGGER, MARIA SHRIVER, ERIC H. HOLDER, JR. and others
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1961
GOODWIN v. DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA SUPERIOR COURT
as 1:2011cv01191
Plaintiff:
SABIN LOINEL GOODWIN
Defendant:
DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA SUPERIOR COURT
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2011cv01155
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000
ITPE PENSION FUND et al v. STRONGHOLD SECURITY, LLC
as 1:2011cv00940
Plaintiff:
ITPE PENSION FUND , DENNIS R. ARRINGTON , JERRY M. BOWDEN and others
Defendant:
STRONGHOLD SECURITY, LLC
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1132
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2010cv00636
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: Violation of Congressional Accountability Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2010cv00629
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: Violation of Congressional Accountability Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
