Cases 1 - 10 of 64
(PC) Goodwin v. Gomez et al
as 2:2024cv00501
Plaintiff:
Patrick Glenn Goodwin and Patrick Glen Goodwin
Defendant:
A. Gomez, A. Hidalgo, L. Hernandez and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Khan v. Daly City Police Department et al
as 3:2023cv00400
Plaintiff:
David Khan
Defendant:
Daly City Police Department, Jose Ortega, Jr., Michael Brennan and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
(HC) Barkacs v. Goodwin
as 3:2022cv01246
Petitioner:
James Robert Barkacs
Respondent:
Panel Judge Goodwin
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
(HC) Barkacs v. Goodwin
as 1:2022cv00986
Petitioner:
James Robert Barkacs
Respondent:
Goodwin
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Melvin Goodwin Bentley, II v. Patrick Covello
as 2:2022cv03567
Petitioner:
Melvin Goodwin Bentley, II
Respondent:
Patrick Covello
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
(HC) Goodwin v. Allison
as 2:2022cv00469
Petitioner:
Herbert Deon Goodwin, Jr.
Respondent:
Kathleen Allison
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
(HC) Goodwin v. Allison
as 1:2022cv00298
Petitioner:
Herbert Deon Goodwin, Jr.
Respondent:
Kathleen Allison
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Matthew Roland Betts v. Ron Goodwin et al
as 2:2022cv01597
Petitioner:
Matthew Roland Betts
Respondent:
Ron Goodwin and Kathleen Allison
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Elbert E. Hidalgo v. Unknown
as 2:2020cv08406
Plaintiff:
Elbert E. Hidalgo
Defendant:
Unknown, Unknown Wiggins, Unknown Johnson and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Bonilla v. Clay
as 4:2020cv04304
Defendant:
Michael E. Delllastrillo, Toni Cantil-Sakauye, Andrew G. Schopler and others
Plaintiff:
Steven Wayne Bonilla
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
