Cases 1 - 10 of 16
Pierce v. Schwebel Baking Company et al.
as 4:2024cv00612
Plaintiff:
Marcus Pierce
Defendant:
Schwebel Baking Company and Local 377 Chauffeurs, Teamsters, Warehousemen & Helpers Union
Pierce v. Wash Wag, LLC
as 1:2023cv00234
Plaintiff:
Holly Pierce
Defendant:
Wash Wag, LLC
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201 Fair Labor Standards Act
Woodson v. Zale Delaware, Inc.
as 3:2021cv01519
Plaintiff:
Brittany Woodson
Defendant:
Zale Delaware, Inc. d/b/a Piercing Pagoda and Zale Delaware, Inc. doing business as Piercing Pagoda
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Pierce v. Diversified Health Management, Inc. et al
as 2:2021cv02624
Plaintiff:
Paulette Pierce
Defendant:
Diversified Health Management, Inc. and Alexander Phommasathit
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201
Pierce v. Evolution Health, LLC
as 2:2020cv05365
Defendant:
Evolution Health, LLC
Plaintiff:
David Pierce
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201
Kennedy et al v. Certain Care, LLC et al
as 1:2017cv02444
Plaintiff:
Melissa Kennedy , Antonia Mitchell , Renee Camarillo and others
Defendant:
Certain Care, LLC and Denise Riehle
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201
Clardy et al v. Faith Mission Inc et al
as 2:2015cv03086
Plaintiff:
Simona Clardy , Jerry Pierce Sr. and Marchalle Couch
Defendant:
Faith Mission Inc and Lutheran Social Services of Central Ohio
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 2617
Houck et al v. Dempsey Brothers, Inc. et al
as 3:2011cv01087
Defendant:
Dempsey Brothers, Inc. and Paul Dempsey
Plaintiff:
Shea Houck , Candy Rider and Nicholas Pierce
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 2
Knapp v. Merrill Lynch Pierce Fenner & Smith, Incorporated et al
as 5:2010cv02697
Plaintiff:
Tonya Knapp
Defendant:
Merrill Lynch Pierce Fenner & Smith, Incorporated and Scott Cox
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201
Sadler v. MC3, L.L.C et al
as 4:2010cv00044
Plaintiff:
David Sadler
Defendant:
MC3, L.L.C, Jane Ketchum, Joel D Pierce and others
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1001 E.R.I.S.A.: Employee Retirement
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
