Cases 21 - 30 of 42
RHETT v. T. MICHEAL POWER
as 1:2008cv03076
Petitioner:
ANDREW RHETT
Respondent:
T. MICHEAL POWER
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
TORRES v. POWER et al
as 2:2008cv02815
Petitioner:
OBED TORRES
Respondent:
MICHAEL POWER and THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE STATE OF NEW JERSEY
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
TOZER v. POWER et al
as 1:2008cv02432
Plaintiff:
WILLIAM TOZER
Defendant:
MIKE POWER and THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE STATE OF NEW JERSEY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
SONNTAG v. POWERS et al
as 2:2008cv01952
Petitioner:
CHARLES SONNTAG
Respondent:
MICHAEL POWERS and STATE OF NEW JERSEY
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
BULL v. POWER
as 2:2008cv01380
Plaintiff:
RODNEY BULL
Defendant:
MIKE POWER
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
FRANCES v. POWER et al
as 2:2008cv00992
Petitioner:
PATRICK FRANCES
Respondent:
MIKE POWER and ANNE MILGRAM
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
WATSON v. POWERS et al
as 2:2007cv05499
Petitioner:
CARLYLE WATSON
Respondent:
MICHAEL POWERS and ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE STATE OF NEW JERSEY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
CAMILO v. POWERS et al
as 2:2007cv05479
Petitioner:
JOSE CAMILO
Respondent:
MICHAEL POWERS and STATE OF NEW JERSEY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
BARNES v. POWER
as 2:2007cv05308
Petitioner:
TYRONE BARNES
Respondent:
T. M. POWER
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
SZEMPLE v. CORRECTIONAL MEDICAL SERVICES, INC. et al
as 2:2007cv04943
Plaintiff:
CRAIG FRANCIS SZEMPLE
Defendant:
CORRECTIONAL MEDICAL SERVICES, INC., NEW JERSEY DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS, DEVON BROWN and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
