Cases 1 - 9 of 9
Rodriguez-Soto et al v. Rego et al
as 1:2024cv10284
Plaintiff:
Noralba Rodriguez-Soto and Urbano Patino
Defendant:
Aiden Rego, Katherine Burger, Timsi Rao and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Auto Negligence
Rao v. Thuo et al
as 1:2021cv10461
Defendant:
Peter T Bethoney, Lucy N Thiongo, Nicollette A Lynch and others
Plaintiff:
Nicholas Rao
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1396
Ashby v. Rao et al
as 1:2016cv12405
Plaintiff:
Victoria Ashby
Defendant:
Vijay Rao and GEICO General General Insurance Company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Raso v. Rutledge Flooring Contractors, Inc. et al
as 1:2016cv12012
Defendant:
Rutledge Flooring Contractors, Inc. and Jean Paul Rutledge
Plaintiff:
Charles Raos
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1001
Bard, Rao & Athanas Consulting Engineers, LLC v. Liberty Insurance Underwriters, Inc.
as 1:2014cv11652
Plaintiff:
Bard, Rao & Athanas Consulting Engineers, LLC
Defendant:
Liberty Insurance Underwriters, Inc.
Counter_claimant:
Liberty Insurance Underwriters, Inc.
Counter_defendant:
Bard, Rao & Athanas Consulting Engineers, LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Sivapurapu et al v. The Bank of New York Mellon Trust Company, NA
as 1:2012cv10443
Plaintiff:
Rao N. Sivapurapu and Sangeetha Sivapurapu
Defendant:
The Bank of New York Mellon Trust Company, N.A.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Di Nicolo et al v. Perik et al
as 1:2011cv12008
Plaintiff:
Calvin Di Nicolo
Defendant:
Michael J Perik, Christian G. Kasper, Stephen C. Richards and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Washtenaw County Employees' Retirement System v. The Princeton Review, Inc. et al
as 1:2011cv11359
Plaintiff:
Washtenaw County Employees' Retirement System
Defendant:
The Princeton Review, Inc. , Michael Perik , Stephen C. Richards and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 77
Rao v. United States of America
as 1:2008cv12027
Plaintiff:
Jaywant Rao
Defendant:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: U.S. Government Defendant
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
