Cases filed in Michigan
United State of America v. Nimmagadda
as 3:2019cv12077
Defendant: Srinivasarao Nimmagadda and Srinivasa Rao Nimmagadda
Plaintiff: United States
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2019cv10341
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 702
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2017cv11405
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 551
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2016cv11430
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 702
Nithyananda Dhanapeetam of Columbus et al v. Rao We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 2:2014mc51228
In Re: Certification of Judgment 2:13-cv-00526 Southern District of Ohio
Plaintiff: Nithyananda Dhanapeetam of Columbus
Defendant: Aarthi S. Rao
Respondent: Manickam Narayanan
United States Securities and Exchange Commission v. Mukkamala et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 2:2012cv13020
Defendant: Apparao Mukkamala, Suresh Anne, Jitendra Prasad Katneni and others
Plaintiff: United States Securities and Exchange Commission
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 78
Dunkin' Donut Franchised Restaurants, LLC et al v. Comboz, LLC et al
as 2:2009cv13422
Plaintiff: Dunkin' Donut Franchised Restaurants, LLC, Dunkin' Donut Franchised Restaurants, LLC, DD IP Holder LLC and others
Defendant: Comboz, LLC, Rav Group, LLC, Tazmania Donuts, LLC and others
Counter Claimant: Tromboz, LLC, Ravindra Rao, Comboz, LLC and others
Counter Defendant: Dunkin' Donut Franchised Restaurants, LLC, Dunkin' Donut Franchised Restaurants, LLC, DD IP Holder LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1114 Trademark Infringement
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2007cv12710
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: No cause code entered

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?