Cases 1 - 10 of 19
Robertson v. Yazoo County, Mississippi et al
as 3:2024cv00179
Plaintiff:
Lakeisha Robertson
Defendant:
Yazoo County, Mississippi, Jake Sheriff and John Does 1-5
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Gipson v. Robertson et al
as 1:2022cv00128
Plaintiff:
Chad Gipson
Defendant:
Aaron A. Robertson, Clement Logistics, LLC and John Does Nos. 1-10
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Tort/Motor Vehicle (P.I.)
Robertson v. Guidry
as 2:2022cv00090
Plaintiff:
Julian Robertson
Defendant:
David Guidry
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
Robertson v. Ally et al
as 3:2022cv00133
Plaintiff:
George Robertson
Defendant:
Kervin Ally and John Does 1-10
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1446 Notice of Removal
Bollwitt et al v. Baptist Memorial Hospital - Golden Triangle, Inc. et al
as 1:2020cv00112
Defendant:
ECI HP E-Health (TN), PLLC, NP Tyrone Rupert, John Does 1-10 and others
Plaintiff:
Michael Bollwitt and Jeri Bollwitt
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Reese v. Robertson et al
as 1:2020cv00088
Defendant:
Brylon K. Robertson and U.S. Xpress, Inc.
Plaintiff:
Debra J. Reese
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Robertson et al v. Southeast Supply Header, LLC
as 2:2019cv00199
Plaintiff:
Jay Robertson and Ladonnis Robertson
Defendant:
Southeast Supply Header, LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Robertson v. United States of America
as 3:2018cv00578
Plaintiff:
Shononda Robertson
Defendant:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2671
Boyd v. Department of Medicaid et al
as 3:2016cv00374
Plaintiff:
Ralph W. Boyd
Defendant:
Department of Medicaid, Associate of Magnolia Insurance Mississippi, CAN Department of Federal Government and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Robertson v. Landy
as 1:2015cv00039
Plaintiff:
Bishop Robertson
Defendant:
Stephen Hall Landy
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
