Cases 1 - 10 of 25
Robertson et al v. PV Holding Corporation et al
as 4:2023cv01502
Plaintiff:
Lindsay A. Robertson and J.M.R.
Defendant:
PV Holding Corporation and Charles J. Gibson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Tort/Motor Vehicle (
Robertson v. Monsanto Company
as 4:2023cv00619
Plaintiff:
Darlene Robertson
Defendant:
Monsanto Company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Randall v. Cristobal et al
as 5:2021cv06089
Plaintiff:
Ryan Randall
Defendant:
Ismael Cristobal, Lauren Houston, Richard McGregory and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Robertson v. Sams East, Inc.
as 3:2021cv05065
Plaintiff:
Joyce Robertson
Defendant:
Sams East, Inc. doing business as Sam's Club
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Robertson v. Yusuf et al
as 3:2021cv05019
Plaintiff:
Geroge L Robertson and George L Robertson
Defendant:
GSA Express LCC, Abdufatah Yusuf and GSA Express LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Robertson v. Cook Incorporated et al
as 4:2020cv01518
Defendant:
Cook Medical LLC, Cook Incorporated, Cook Medical Incorporated and others
Plaintiff:
Dominic Robertson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Robertson v. Monsanto Company
as 4:2020cv00017
Defendant:
Monsanto Company
Plaintiff:
James M Robertson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Robertson v. Mallinckrodt PLC et al
as 4:2019cv02640
Defendant:
Purdue Pharma L.P., Mallinckrodt LLC, Mallinckrodt PLC and others
Plaintiff:
Terry Robertson, Individually and as Surviving Spouse of Pamela L. Robertson, Deceased and Terry Robertson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Mize et al v. Monsanto Company
as 4:2018cv02146
Defendant:
Monsanto Company
Plaintiff:
Dana Wolford, Larry Mize, Orlando Moore and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Robertson v. Davol Inc. et al
as 2:2018cv04174
Plaintiff:
Jason Robertson
Defendant:
C.R.Bard, Inc. and Davol Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
