Cases 1 - 10 of 22
Savage v. Idaho Sex Offender Central Registry, et al.
as 1:2022cv00204
Plaintiff:
Brandon Savage
Defendant:
Idaho Sex Offender Registry, Idaho State Police, Sex Offender Management Board and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Savage v. Dowell
as 1:2022cv00080
Plaintiff:
Brandon Savage
Defendant:
Ashley Dowell
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Savage v. Idaho Department of Corrections, et al.
as 1:2021cv00287
Plaintiff:
Brandon E Savage
Defendant:
Idaho Department of Corrections and Pardons and Parole Commission
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Savage v. ADT LLC
as 1:2020cv00175
Plaintiff:
Brad Savage
Defendant:
ADT LLC dba ADT Security Services
Cause Of Action: 47 U.S.C. § 227
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2020cv00120
Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 158
Savage v. Heath
as 1:2017cv00208
Plaintiff:
Brandon Savage
Defendant:
Brooke Heath
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Savage v. District Court of the Third Judicial District in and for the County of Canyon
as 1:2016cv00464
Plaintiff:
Brandon Savage
Defendant:
District Court of the Third Judicial District in and for the County of Canyon
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Savage v. Davison et al
as 1:2016cv00074
Plaintiff:
Brandon Savage
Defendant:
Kyle Davison, Corey Seeley and Howard Keith Yordy
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Savage v. Gelok et al
as 1:2016cv00073
Plaintiff:
Brandon Savage
Defendant:
Christian Gelok, William Poulson, Agler and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Wall v. United States Department of Agriculture Forest Service Northern Region One et al
as 2:2016cv00043
Plaintiff:
Frank Reginald Wall
Defendant:
United States Department of Agriculture Forest Service Northern Region One, MT USDA Kootenai National Forest Service, David E Schmid and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
